Anyone Else Think This is a Seriously BAD Idea?
#21
Posted 19 January 2009 - 12:37 AM
The blues and the Blues Brothers have become unique parts of our American culture and now transcend any one person or group of people. If there should be any plot to a third film, it should somehow suggest, subliminaly or not, that a passing of the torch is taking place from one generation to the next. Have Elwood and the original band put together a new younger band made up of orphans for a blues competition to benefit an orphanage or something. Have them teach the players, but riddle it with follies and car chases reminiscent of the original. Of course, there need to be a group that doesn't want that to happen -perhaps a group bent on winning the competition who will go to any length to make it happen. This leads Elwood and the band on a series of "mis-adventures" to gather up a group under the radar.
#22
Posted 01 February 2009 - 05:07 PM
#23
Posted 02 February 2009 - 04:46 AM
#24
Posted 02 February 2009 - 05:42 AM
Quote
I couldn't be bothered writing something i've written before so i'll just refer you to thread titled "Worst part of movie - BB2000", page five. Enjoy.
#25
Posted 04 February 2009 - 11:09 AM
;)Age: Age is attitude. Period. It is what you make it to be. Let's remember that the real Bluesmen were older dudes.
:-DMake Another BB Movie: Mmmmm....only if we get rid of the cat that did the choreography for BB2000. The dancing in the entire movie was lame. C'mon, ya gotta be kiddin' me.
http://www.bluesbrotherscentral.com/forum2/public/style_emoticons/default/icon_cool.gifWho should be in BB3?: Of course we have to bring back "The Band, Elwood." Gotta have The Blues Brothers Band.
How about bringing in Robert Randolph and his band along Buddy Guy, and Kebmo' for starters.
How about Macy Gray? Let's also go with The Red Hot Chili Peppers and we have to have Joe Walsh.
Now that James Brown has passed on, how about we get a real "fired up" preacher like TD Jakes to make an appearance to help the boys "find the way" to redemption. This cat even has his own Gospel Choir. Or better yet, get The Brooklyn Tabernacle Choir. They've won several Grammies already.
My idea is to have musicians and music groups that will bring in a wide audience. Heck, I bet Bruce Sprinsteen would jump on board.
I just don't want the choreographer from BB2000 involved.
The Blues is just a good man feelin' bad.
#26
Posted 04 February 2009 - 06:38 PM
#27
Posted 05 February 2009 - 06:19 PM
#28
Posted 28 March 2009 - 11:20 AM
Bunch said:
itsallblack
#29
Posted 20 May 2009 - 04:35 PM
Jake: Come on!
Elwood: Ow!
#30
Posted 21 May 2009 - 04:51 AM
on one side of the coin there is this debate of making BB3 & turning into a trilogy - this way then we could get Zee in the film & tie up all those loose ends as well as make the film open for a new generation of Blues Brothers fans. Yes it would be nice to see Zee added to the story & to see what happened after the car chase at the end of BB2k & what became of Buster & Cab
On the other side of the coin there is this "some things are best left alone" aspect. Leave the fans wanting more & the Blues Brothers was never intended to be a trilogy.. but perhaps it's value isn't the fact it happens, but the fact it doesn't so we are left guessing & the fans can draw their own conclusion.
Plus as i said before, there is this too many cooks aspect.. the Rocky series & Police academy films were successful, but the numerous sequels killed them off so sometimes you can't give people what they want to succeed... if they had made 1 or 2 films then no dount we'd see Police academy achieving the same cult following, but they didn't know when to stop.. some character actors will "kill off" their character at the peak of their popularity, this negative action does activate a positive in that people want more & are kept hanging on to the memory which keeps them alive because their legacy lives on. It's also been said that if JFK wasn't assasinated he wouldn't of had such an impact on modern history, but because he died when he did people stopped to reflect on what positives he had, if he'd lived he'd be hailed as a failure & people would reflect on his womanising & his mistakes!
The Rocky Horror show has many similarities with the Blues Brothers with regards a cult following & the fact they are musicals also adds to the magic.. stage shows, musicals, numerous conventions etc take place on a worldwide scale & many people still pack out the theatre when the tours are on & many people still dress the part as well - even teenagers who weren't even born when the film was made & their parents (perhaps even Grandparents) probably went along to the 1st tours, i very much doubt if we ever had a Rocky Horror show sequel or trilogy, the show would have the same impact.
#31
Posted 21 May 2009 - 05:19 AM
Quote
My sentiments exactly. I've been saying this for years only to have people scratch their heads and say, "Huh?"
Well said M-W. Very solid comments!
#32
Posted 21 May 2009 - 05:27 AM
Don;t forget there have been numerous tours of the show, along with computer games, merchandise sales, models etc to build that cult fan following etc etc all along the same lines as with the Blues Brothers.
The difference is there was only 1 story for the Rocky Horror show & a sequel has never been made into a movie.. OK we had "Shock treatment" but it was a seperate feature as a spin-off film, rather than a sequel & yes, there is a Rocky Horror show film remake in the pipeline, but the fact remains they did 1 show, revolving around 1 storyline. The Blues Brothers have made a movie sequel - if it was done simply as a spin-off it may of been better.
#33
Posted 14 June 2009 - 07:49 PM
#34
Posted 29 June 2009 - 04:08 PM
much musicians are ready to join in a third movie, it wouldn"t be no more problem to do a third.
But there is one reason, why I think, that Elwood searches for a NEW BAND.
I read that Matt Murphy is over 80 and he got strokes....
That wouldnt be a good idea, to introduce him a third time.
I thought of The Sacred Hearts as the NEW BAND........
togehter with Adam Samaris(hopefully)
#35
Posted 29 June 2009 - 06:32 PM
Blueblood said:
Well said M-W. Very solid comments!
I agree as well. Coincidentally, Rocky Horror is one of my favorites as well!
#36
Posted 02 July 2009 - 07:30 AM
Why wouldn't they use Jim Belushi???? He didn't want to do it???
It worked for Lynyrd Skynyrd.........No?
#37
Posted 02 July 2009 - 09:26 AM
NYC BLUESMAN said:
Why wouldn't they use Jim Belushi???? He didn't want to do it???
It worked for Lynyrd Skynyrd.........No?
Because John Goodman had already proved his set of bluesy pipes on Roseanne.
Because Jim Belushi had a scheduling conflict. He was originally supposed to be in BB2k, with his character very similar to Cab's. (Police officer, Jake's half brother.)
#38
Posted 21 October 2009 - 07:44 PM
its not gonna do very good.
#39
Posted 08 November 2009 - 09:21 AM
takkuneg said:
Because Jim Belushi had a scheduling conflict. He was originally supposed to be in BB2k, with his character very similar to Cab's. (Police officer, Jake's half brother.)
Belushi87 said:
its not gonna do very good.
It will be! Zee and Elwood. Hopefully again with Mack, for a very last thing with the Blues Brothers. MAck was great, i hope he will return for his last leading role in a Blues Brothers 3 movie
Dean ^^
#40
Posted 06 December 2009 - 09:04 AM
Scheduling ties seem to be a problem with BB films.. Paul Shaffer couldn't commit to what was his role in BB1 so Murph was selected. So before any film is made, i think it's only right to ensure the cast list they want can all commit to the task in hand.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















