Personal opinions on BB2000
#1
Posted 15 March 2004 - 09:21 AM
#2
Posted 16 March 2004 - 01:39 AM
Wouldn't you agree?
#3
Posted 16 March 2004 - 10:58 AM
The music in the 2nd 1 is good sure..story was
just not the same.
#4
Posted 31 March 2004 - 03:33 PM
If you think about, Elwwod really had no reason to get the band back together. Except, just to play. No charity, or anything.
I did really enjoy the music. My son likes it too. He has yet to see it, but has the soundtrack.
#5
Posted 31 March 2004 - 07:41 PM
#6
Posted 01 April 2004 - 12:06 AM
#7
Posted 01 April 2004 - 05:57 AM
#8
Posted 05 April 2004 - 10:23 AM
It's a great album, full of great Blues legends!
Senior Administrator
Blues Brothers Central
http://www.bluesbrotherscentral.com
Twitter | Facebook
#9
Posted 07 April 2004 - 04:22 AM
#10
Posted 02 May 2004 - 08:54 AM
#11
Posted 08 May 2004 - 03:14 AM
#12
Posted 16 May 2004 - 10:22 AM
#13
Posted 16 May 2004 - 01:17 PM
Speaking of a Blues Brothers 'part 3' , JakeBlues36, there is this:
The John Belushi Estate and Dan Aykroyd
Present:
T H E O F F I C I A L
BLUES BROTHERS REVIVAL
"American icons Jake and Elwood Blues, also known as "The Blues Brothers," are coming home to stay -- back to Sweet Home Chicago in the world premiere musical of The Blues Brothers Revival. Opening in the Windy City and planned as a continuous run, The Blues Brothers Revival will preview April 9 and open on April 20. The musical will capture the spirit of the original Blues Brothers movie and pay homage to Chicago's rich history of blues, gospel and traditional soul music while throwing in Jake and Elwood Blues into the mix. It's where it all started -- its where the Blues Brothers began.
This live stage musical will combine the hits from the original movie as well as the five popular albums put out by John Belushi and Dan Aykroyd. The musical is presented by the John Belushi Estate, Judy Belushi Pisano and Dan Aykroyd.
Producer/director Victor Pisano, who wrote the musical stage play, will direct the performance, at the Chicago Center for the Performing Arts, 777 N. Green Street. Established Chicago Blues artists will form the new "Blues Brothers Revival Band" on stage. It is also envisioned that the cast of Gospel singers and other cast members will be from the city of Chicago.
The Blues Brothers Revival is woven around John Belushi's character Jake, who has spent most of the last several years stuck in Purgatory. Elwood and a cast of Gospel characters use whatever musical means possible to get him out and up into the "Kingdom of Heaven." Jake, Elwood and the Cast attempt this musical redemption every performance with the able assistance of the audience. The two Act Musical has a 1970 South Side Chicago set.
The raucous fun will include their encounters with black magic, beautiful blues singers, Chicago cops, as well as an orphanage nun, Mother Immaculata who leads the cast in an Irish step dance. The Band is comprised of street musicians playing classic Blues Brothers songs: Soul Man, She Caught The Katy, Sweet Home Chicago, Shotgun Blues, Rubber Biscuit, Jailhouse Rock to name a few and the show also features the classic hit songs R-E-S-P-E-C-T, Son of a Preacher, Rawhide, Minnie the Moocher and a number of American Gospel classics.
The Chicago Center for the Performing Arts is the city's newest multi-venue entertainment complex in the city's burgeoning River West area, minutes from the Chicago Loop."
Dan Aykroyd was in town a few weeks ago for the opening of the show. (April 20)
AS of today, I haven't spoken with anyone I know who has seen this show. Since it is a theatrical performance, the focus will be on the music, dancing and the story. I do want to go see this.
Back on topic, I can honestly say that I have never seen Blues Brothers 2000. I vividly remember seeing the billboards around town and thinking to myself----"How are they going to make a sequel when Jake is dead?" "Who the heck are the people pictured on that poster?" "Why the heck is there a little kid in a hat and sunglasses?" (Lord, please don't let it be some sort of reincarnation of Jake) And then I learned that the ""story"" (double sarcastic air quotes) was allegedly to take place in Chicago, but absolutely none of it was even filmed in Chicago. That's when I thought to myself that this was some thing that would horribly scar me for life if I ever saw it.
I heard that the music was O.K. though. I'm curious, but apparently not that curious yet.
Reading this thread will reinforce my resolve to steer clear of it . However, I might pick up the sound track.
The stage show, on the other hand, is something I will see.
#14
Posted 28 May 2004 - 05:25 AM
Elwood is completely different, he actually SMILES for crying out loud, and talks - a lot. Elwood never smiles in the first movie and rarely talks to anyone except Jake. And in this film, he takes Jake's death in his stride. They're brothers, they grew up together, you'd think he'd be depressed! But no, he gets over it easily enough.
Mack can't replace Jake, Cab was alright, but Buster was just too cheesy. The references to the first movie were generally pretty good and I did like the musical mumbers. The big car pile-up was crap, it went on way too long and didn't have the fun of the original car chases.
There were some great moments though, the best being 'GET THAT MOUND OF MOSS!' and when Elwood takes off his shades only to be immediately blinded.
Without John, it couldn't have really worked. But it could have been better than this. And what was with all that voodoo/zombie/magic crap?
#15
Posted 29 May 2004 - 02:27 AM
#16
Posted 04 June 2004 - 12:14 PM
the new blues mobile can fly and drive underwater. there are now 3 adult blues brothers and a kid, jake died, curtis died (2 reesons i think the moovy shoodnt have been made) most of the band is in it, no ray charles, and theres only one car crash worth metioning.....
shood i watch it, or will i just think that they ruined the blues brothers?
#17
Posted 04 June 2004 - 01:23 PM
#18
Posted 04 June 2004 - 10:35 PM
But you could still want to see it(if you have enough stomach )
to see Mighty Mack singing looking for a fox and, the james Brown
and Junior Wells songs at the end of the movie that are NOT included in the soundtrack CD
#19
Posted 05 June 2004 - 01:20 AM
#20
Posted 06 June 2004 - 09:11 AM
But because he's smiling and talking so much in the second it's not a big deal when he comes out of the normal character.
That probably didn't make much sense, I'm sorry. I really love Elwood but I can never explain why.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













